Posts Tagged ‘nutrition’

Legume Basics

Tuesday, July 27th, 2010

Legumes are all edible when young in the pod, although we only eat beans, peas and fava beans at that stage of growth. We are more familiar with legumes after they fully mature and dry.

In fact, a major contributing factor to their historical popularity, besides their nutritional value, is that they store so well in dried form-almost indefinitely without deteriorating. A third way we eat legumes is freshly sprouted.

legumes_header

Dry legumes, like most seeds, quickly sprout in moist, warm conditions, providing flavorful and crisp sprouts, but only modest nutrition. It is in the dried form that most legumes find their ways to our dining tables.

Once legumes reach their mature stage, the pods become dry and brittle, they crumble and release the seeds. Before the farmers can be harvest legumes, the pods must dry thoroughly on the vine. Though they originally contain a lot of water (about 80 percent), by the time they are fully dried, their moisture content is less than 20 percent.

If we look at a seed under the microscope, we find three parts. The central mass of substance is the main storage area for the new plant, called the cotyledon. Inside this mass is the embryo of the new plant complete with two tiny leaves, roots and stems. A tube attaches this embryo to the mass of cotyledon, and once the plant emerges, the embryo receives its food supply through this tube, like human embryo through an umbilical cord.

The third part is the seed coat, which acts like our skin. It keeps the whole thing together and protects it from external threats. To serve this purpose, it needs to be tough-a significant fact for cooks, because it is the last thing to soften on cooking. If we cook legumes too long, the skin bursts, spilling out the soft, mushy insides.

The seed coat is tough but it doesn’t protect the seed from hungry insects and animals with sharp teeth and strong jaws. The bean needs other defenses to combat them. Its first defense is two proteins (protease inhibitor and lectin) that interfere with digestion of an animal that is foolish enough to eat the seeds raw. Scientists have shown in experiments that animals fed only raw soybeans actually lose weight because it takes more energy to digest them than they provide.

legumes

Rather than learn how to cook them, as we did, animals learned to avoid the raw legumes-those that didn’t died of starvation. One of these two proteins (lectin) provides another protective mechanism-agglutination. It actually causes cells in the eater’s body to clump together. When scientists feed rats only raw beans, they die within a few days because of this.

There’s still another line of defense, this is more straightforward. Many legumes contain the toxin cyanide, that kills any hungry creature that attempts a meal from them. Don’t worry much about this one, though. Only lima beans contain enough to cause a problem in the human body. Older varieties of lima beans had to be cooked thoroughly to eliminate cyanide.

Newer varieties people grow in most parts of the world have had most of the cyanide bred out of them. However, even if it contains cyanide, properly cooked lima beans is not poisonous. Cooked in an uncovered pot the cyanide evaporates. A covered pot traps it, and it falls back into whatever is cooking in the pot. While heat can deactivate the cyanogenic compound in lima beans, cooking old varieties in a covered pot could deactivate you.

Don’t take beans out of your diet because of what you’ve just read. Heat gets rid of the two proteins that interfere with digestion and the cyanide as well.

Legume varieties

Of the 20 major species of legumes we find 7 that are reasonably well known in North

America:

1. Common beans with about a dozen varieties

2. Lentils-the most common variety is brown lentil

3. Peas-yellow, green and black-eyed

4. Chickpeas-we also know it as garbanzo beans by its Italian name

5. Fava beans

6. Soybeans-we use very little directly for food, but for its oil and in innumerable

soybean products

7. Peanuts-always popular in many forms; we use them as nuts

We cook beans, lentils, peas and chickpeas in many different dishes, fava beans much less frequently, and usually as fresh young vegetables. We use soybeans in a variety of forms but rarely by themselves-we combine them with other ingredients.

beans

The seventh popular legume, the peanut, we actually use as a nut, so I included it in the chapter on nuts. Here is a list of the 13 best known common beans among the hundreds of varieties:

Adzuki (or Chinese)

Black (or turtle)

Cranberry

Great Northern

Lima (both baby and large)

Mung (both green and black)

Navy

Pinto

Red kidney (both light and dark)

Pink

Small red

Small white (or California small white)

White kidney (or cannellini)

While most of the common beans look different, they have very similar flavor. You probably could not tell one from another unless you were taste-testing them side by side.

Tradition, however, demands a specific bean for a specific dish. For a chili con carne, for instance, we prefer pinto beans, for Boston baked beans, navy beans and for the Southern hopping john, black-eyed peas. But don’t be afraid to substitute with whichever you happen to have on hand. It is what you add to them that gives the flavor definition.

Benefits Chinese Food and Nutrition

Monday, July 26th, 2010

Chinese food can be considered a magical key to health. They point to the lower incidence of heart disease and certain cancers among the Chinese. Others state that the average Chinese meal is a disaster because of high levels of sodium, fat and calories. Not surprisingly, both these extreme views overlook a number of important facts and qualifiers.

chinesefood1

It’s true that certain Chinese dishes are invariably high in calories, often containing a high percentage of saturated fat. Six fried dumplings, for example, equals about 700 calories, a third of which are in the form of saturated fat. And fried dumplings may be only a portion of the total meal. Add sweet and sour pork or other similar items and the total may well reach over 1,250 calories.

Numbers like that may be fine for those who don’t need to limit their total daily intake. A large, healthy person may consume as many as 3,000 calories per day and still remain at their normal weight and body fat percentage. But for most, especially those on a restricted calorie diet of less than 1,700 per day, that one meal constitutes over 73% of the total.

Nevertheless, there is an enormous variety of Chinese cuisine dishes that are low or moderate calorie, while providing a range of healthy nutritional elements.

Many Chinese dishes are prepared with fresh vegetables. True, they may be stir-fried, adding calories and fat. Or, they can be steamed providing a healthy side dish or component of the recipe. The method is as important as the ingredient in determining whether a particular dish is a healthy option or not.

chinese-chicken-salad

Wonton, egg-drop, or hot and sour soups provide a modest number of calories. If prepared without large quantities of salt, they also provide a low sodium and satisfying meal, or portion. Chicken that is boiled or steamed, a common method in many Chinese-style preparations, provides needed protein with little fat. Steamed rice, in moderation, is low calorie (200 per cup) and highly nutritious.

Soy is a common ingredient of both dishes and sauces. It is a rich source of plant protein and fiber. It is rich in Vitamin B6 and isoflavones, widely believed by experts to provide nutritional benefits. Vitamin B6 is an important building block for essential amino acids and is used in certain vital neurotransmitters. Isoflavones are reputed by several studies to be an important part of the low heart disease rate in Asian countries. They’re thought to help lower LDL cholesterol levels.

So, as is the case with the cuisine of any other culture, there is no inherent good or bad to all Chinese dishes. The same principles apply here as they do anywhere else. Watch calories, fat percentage and the levels of sodium and other components. That’s the best way, in any instance, to arrive at reasonable dietary decisions

Weston A. Price in the research of healthy food Part III

Saturday, February 13th, 2010

Price was heading towards an organic vision of food and health, being much ahead of its time. He understood that by eating we are bounding with the earth and its elements, as well as solar energy. “Dinner that I took tonight,” as he was saying in a lecture that he held in 1928, “was part of the sun with a few months ago. The food industry hides and diminishes these links. By stretching the Tropic chain, so that the population from the big cities can be nourished using far away soil, we violate the “laws of nature” at least twice: stealing nutrients from the soil in which plants were grown and then wasting them trough food processing. Unlike the indigenous populations studied by Price, which endeavored to return nutrients back to the local soils on which their entire existence depended, “our modern civilization returns extremely few nutrients compared to the quantities consumed”. Renner shows us how Price came to the conclusion that the food and health problem is actually an organic dysfunction. Destroying links between local soils, local food and local populations, the industrial system, it can not fulfill the biochemical requirements of the body, which, by not having time to adapt, will collapse.

agriculture_nutrition

Regardless whether or not you are willing to follow Dr. Price in his long journey, he and all other researchers of western diets from the twentieth century that have returned to the civilized world with the same simple conclusion, devastating and hard to resist: the human animal is adapted and apparently can prosper on the basis of extremely varied diets, but the Western diet, however you define it does not seem to be a part of them.

But the ecological critic of the industrial civilization that was promoted by Weston Price in 1930 hasn’t survived the Second World War.  The niche of this type of writings-in which Sir Howard and Lord Northbourne from England and the American agrarians took part- closed shortly after Price published “Nutrition and Physical degeneration” in 1939. Soon, people had to turn the back to the attacks on “industrial civilization”, on which their salvation depended in time of war. At the end of the war, the industrial civilization strengthens his position, becoming more confident.

The next consolidation was the agriculture industry (that had a benefit from the transformation of the mountains in soil fertilizers and toxic gas in pesticides) shortly the other types of agriculture disappeared. Weston Price and his colleagues who had studied the western diseases had been forgotten by now. No one was willing to look back or to recognize the wisdom of the primitive groups, moreover, they disappeared or were quickly assimilate, even Aborigines were moving to the city.

aborigines

In terms of the Western diseases, these didn’t disappeared- immediately after the war the rates of heart disease have exploded-but now they remained to the responsibility of modern medicine and to the reductionist science.          The nourishment became a widely language accepted in discussion about nutrition and health. The industrial food chain would be brought up again late in the 60s along with the rise of organic agriculture.

What is known, but is not told Part I

Saturday, January 30th, 2010

Eventually, even the largest, most ambitious and most cited study on nutrition and health like Nurses’ Health Study, Women’s Health Initiative and almost all the other, leave the main features of Western food unaffected: many food products and processed meats, many added sugars and fats, except fruit, vegetables and whole grains. According to the nutritionist paradigm and the limits of reductionist science, most researchers are playing with various nutrients individually analyzed, but the subjects with whom they are working are ordinary Americans which are behaving like any ordinary American:          tries to eat smaller amounts of X nutrient and greater quantities of the Y nutrient according to the latest points of view from the nutrition field. But the global nourishment pattern is regarded as a “but” more or less invariable. Therefore probably it should not surprise us the fact that the results of these researches are so modest, equivocal and confuse.

But what about the obvious truth which nobody wants to talk about and what is the food model called Western diet? In the middle of all the nutritional confusion which is getting bigger and bigger, maybe it would be useful to take one step back and fix our eyes on this model, to review all that we know about the Western nutrition and its effects on health. We know that populations that eat like us, Westerners, register much higher rates of cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes and obesity than those whit a traditionally diet. We also know that those who come to the Occident and behave and adopt our behavior food are quickly affected by these diseases and very often these diseases occur in an extremely virulent form, as happens in case of aboriginal and other indigenous peoples.

girl-on-a-diet-eating

The story so-called Western diseases and their links with Western diet starts in the first decades of the twentieth century. At that time, some brave doctors, Europeans and Americans, working with various indigenous populations around the world have started to notice the virtual absence of chronic disease among these individuals, diseases that in fact had become current in the West. Albert Schweitzer in Africa and Denis P. Burkitt, Robert McCarrison in India, Samuel Hutton among Eskimos of Labrador, anthropologist Ales Hrdlicka among Native Americans and dentist Weston A Price in the middle of 12 different groups from all around the world (among the Peruvian Indians, aborigines from Australia and highlander from Switzerland) are drawn, all similar reports.

Researchers have developed lists, most published in medical journals, whit diseases which haven’t  been discovered on  indigenous populations that have been treated or studied: very few cases or no cases of heart disease, diabetes, cancer, obesity, hypertension or heart attack: no case of appendicitis , diverticulitis, deformed dental arches or tooth decay, no case of varicose veins, ulcers or hemorrhoids.

Suddenly, the researchers began to look all these conditions in a new light, just as it is shown by the name of “Western diseases” proposed for the affections by the British doctor Denis Burkitt, who worked in Africa during the Second World War. The formula suggested that these different diseases were somehow related and that probably had a common cause.

You are not only what you eat, you are also the consumed food of the animal that you eat

Tuesday, January 12th, 2010

Meat illustrates the idea that the health of food product can not be separated from the health of the food chain. This means that the health of the soil, of the plants, of the animals and of the consumers depend on each other.

This leads us to a special rule for those who consume products of an animal origin: You are not only what you eat, you are also the consumed food of the animal that you eat.

cow-eating-grass

This means that the animal nutrition whereby we eat is influencing the nutrition quality and the consequences that food has over our health, no matter if it is meat, milk or eggs.

This is supposed to be evidence, but unfortunately it is a systematic ignored truth of the industrial food chain, in his endeavor to produce huge quantities of cheap animal proteins. This effort changed the nourishment of the majority animals bred for consumption; they went from green plants to seeds and cereals over, because of the fact that animals grow faster and produce more milk and eggs if they are fed grains rich in calories. Some of these animals are ruminants which are evolved to feed on grass; if they eat too many seeds they get sick, therefore grain fed cattle should receive antibiotics.

girl-eating-butter

Even those animals that tolerate cereals, like chickens or pigs, are much healthier if fed with fresh green plants, therefore their meat and eggs are healthier. Generally if the animals raised for consumption are fed with grass, their meat, milk and eggs contain much healthier natural fats (more fat acids omega 3 and conjugated linoleic acid or ALC, less fat acids omega 6 and less saturated fat) and higher amounts of vitamins and antioxidants.

Sometimes is the difference visible, for example the yellow butter or the orange yolk is because of the beta-carotene content in fresh grass. So it is worth spending more money looking for products from animals raised in a traditional way on pasture. And even if, seen from the outside, an industrial egg looks exactly like the one coming from hens fed on grass; the industrial egg is several times more expensive than the first one and the two are completely different. So the rule to eat more leaves and less seeds are applied not only for humans but also for animals that are part of our tropic chain

Feed yourselves mostly with plants

Tuesday, January 5th, 2010

If you can, eat in most of the cases food, no matter what this food would require, probably everything would be ok. One of the knowledge that we can draw from the amazing traditional food variance of the entire world is that we can feed extremely varied food, as long as it is food. There have been and still are many healthy types of nourishment rich in fat or healthy low fat nourishments, as long as they are based on integral food not processed food. But there are some integral nourishment that are better than others and some ways to produce and combine them in different menus that are worth trying. This is why the following section will propose some politics regarding what you eat over and beyond “food”.eating vegetables

Feed yourselves mostly with plants and especially with leaves

Scientists haven’t reached a consensus regarding the benefits of plants- is it because of the antioxidants? Is it because of the fibers? Is it because of the Omega-3 fat acids? But it is sure that all scientists agreed that plants are probably beneficial for our health and certainly, they don’t harm. In the interviews that I realized with different nutritionists they all agreed over de benefits of a meal based on plants. Even those nutritionists tempered by decades of disagreement and confusion regarding the recommendations for nutrition, answered my question” ok, but how are your certainties now?”

In a variation on the theme” eat more plants” (Marion Nestle was a little reserved: “it’s obvious that plants don’t harm”)

It is not hard to observe that plants are good for us, but from the evolutionary point of view, the explications are the fact that they are our source of Vitamin C and antioxidants.

Our ancestors had the biological capacity to produce vitamin C, an essential nutrient.

antioxidants-that-help

Like other antioxidants, Vitamin C (or ascorbic acid) is beneficial for our health from at least two points of view. A part of the routine processes of our body, among others the cellular metabolism and the protective inflammation mechanism, produce “oxygen radicals”- oxygen atoms with one odd electron and so with a high chemical reactivity that can generate a lot of problems. Free radicals are involved in many health problems, including cancer and different ageing problems (the output of free radicals is increasing with the ageing) Antioxidants like Vitamin C absorb and stabilizes free radicals before they can make havoc. But this is not the only good thing of antioxidants. In addition, they stimulate the liver which produces the necessary enzymes for the decomposition of antioxidants, enzymes that, once produced, decompose other substances, including different toxins like it. In this way antioxidants contribute to the dangerous chemical neutralization, including the cancerous ones, so if your diet contains several types of antioxidants, so much more toxins will be neutralized in your body. That’s why it’s important to eat as many sorts of plants possible: all contain different antioxidants, so they will help the body to remove different types of toxins. (As rich in toxin the environment is, as many plants you have to consume)